One of the worst hobbies you can pick up is writing. With other hobbies, you need to dedicate specific time to nourish them and practice them. For instance, you can't just paint randomly, there's a setup involved no matter how basic you want to get. Whereas when you are writing, you can just be doing it while writing an email or sending a text or just solving an exam question but are you REALLY doing it.
Like yes, I get the
point that those are different kinds of writing but how do I control the
accidental 'cooking' I concoct while offering unsolicited advice to a friend or
when I execute an autonomous humorous bit during a discussion in the group
chat. Those are well-worded sentences that will never be published with my
name, and at best will be regurgitated by my cohort to a larger more
appreciative audience.
I did say writing is
'one' of the worst, but not the worst because reading is the worst one. Period.
It's got the same problems as writing and then more. It is such an annoying
hobby, because while all-consuming and enveloping there is not much you can do
in this hobby except indulge in it. You cannot really get any better at it;
reading faster isn't always the best. I suppose one of the points I am trying
to dodgedly make so far is also that hobbies like everything in our lives have
become a victim of capitalism. You cannot simply indulge in it. It has to be
turned into something productive, it has to be something you can invest into
and get greater returns from, it has to be able to be screamed about or
social-media-fied, and you have to keep improving and if it's nothing of those
things is it really a hobby?
I digress, let's
circle back to reading. It is hard to even talk to someone who enjoys reading
because really most of the time you are talking about the book more than the
act. The act too has evolved so much over the years.
You must forgive me, I
haven't written anything cohesive that has made its way out of MS Word from my
'E' 'R' and recently dethroned 'H' key-less laptop in about two years. There
are going to be a lot of diversions and meaningless meanderings. But I promise,
there is a point or two in here somewhere.
For the longest period
of time my go-to answer to what my hobby is, has been: 'Reading and Writing'. I
actually enjoy(ed?) doing both of these activities and felt like I could hold a
conversation as well, even if I weren't actively doing them. Or really getting
any better. I reservedly might have publicized like a couple writings in the
past 5 years (despite having written at least a hundred or so, all of them
rotting in MS Word files, or my Notes app) and according to Goodreads my annual
read books are only decreasing.
I say 'according to
Goodreads' because I want to add an element of mystery to my persona—as if I
might be secretly reading dozens of books off-platform, hoarding literary
experiences like some kind of bibliophilic hermit. The truth is more mundane: I
just forgot to log some of the books I read because the website feels
performative and I'm lazy about performing.
Anyway, speaking of
performance, I recently decided I'd maybe try writing more, no matter how
dog-shit it looked to me, (this is my fourth rewrite of this entire 'essay(?)'
as well) and I would let more of my writings see the light of day and not let
my ideas compost waiting for them to blossom a garden for which no seeds were
going to be sown by me.
Did I say there's
going to be a point here and there?
If you enjoy reading
and have ever told someone so, you must have been hit with the question at
least once: 'Who's your favorite author?' The favorite book is easy to answer
and say that it is hard to make a choice. But to say the same on favorite
author puts your claim of having reading as a hobby into jeopardy.
For me, the answer was
very straightforward for so many years: 'Neil Gaiman'.
Long, long pause.
Last June, when I
traveled to the US, whispers had already started. But I didn't want to believe
them—or maybe I couldn't afford to. I happily carried my 'American Gods' copy
wherever I went and got multiple nods on the title from people who caught a glimpse
of it. I loved Gaiman because his books felt authentic despite being compelling
stories in a fantastic world. There were lessons in his books, wisdom wrapped
in myth, and when I read them I could hear his voice guiding me through
impossible worlds that somehow made perfect sense (regrettably
I still would, if I were to read them).
Then the allegations
became impossible to ignore.
You know that feeling
when someone you've admired from afar—someone whose work has shaped how you see
storytelling, imagination, even morality—turns out to be fundamentally
different from who you thought they were? It's not just disappointment. It's a
kind of retroactive embarrassment, like realizing you've been enthusiastically
recommending Typhoid Mary’s Diner to everyone. Suddenly every conversation
where you'd praised his work felt tainted. Every time you'd quoted his stories
or shared his wisdom, you'd been unknowingly promoting someone who had caused
real harm.
When the news hit mainstream media, my world collapsed, not only because I'd supported a terrible person and preached about his stories, but also because suddenly for the first time in my adult life, I had no answer to the question of who my favorite author was. Without any trigger warnings the omens were no longer good; the monsters weren't neverwhere but in front of me; no amount of stardust romance with an open marriage or paternal love with a haunted recreation of a Kipling story was redeemable; the smoke and mirrors had been dissipated to show mans fragile image of self that once wished to even hide from the Sandman. Unfortunately, there was no milk as well.
It was like losing a piece of my identity that I hadn't realized was so central until it was gone.
It was a very busy, busy, busy time of my life though, which provided welcome distraction. And I found myself
unable to field an answer to this question were it ever asked of me.
Thankfully, no one did. Actually someone did ask. And it was myself.
I blame my inability
to read 'any' book for the first four months of 2025 on this very conundrum and
indecision. The weight of every book felt heavy because I wanted it to mean
somthing. Every time I glimpsed at any book or heard about Gaiman again I cringed
simply because I had no answer to the question, who my favorite author was. It
was a gut-wrenching feeling. Of course, I understand now that this was a
vin-dit.
The breakthrough
happened when I was sitting in an old bookshop wondering if I wanted to buy a
book or just pass time in a semi-pleasant manner. I came across a book that
showed the drawings of many famous authors. By this time, I had already
short-listed some favorite author names in my head and involuntarily right now
I was only looking up those specific authors, their drawings and their thought
process behind it.
And to my surprise, I
really liked what Kurt Vonnegut was cooking.
Let's get this
straight. I am awful at recalling stories, whether that be from books, movies,
shows, or real life. I can recall the gist of it but the particulars are always
hazy and I blame my mass consumption of media for it. Keeping that in mind here
are some facts:
- Sirens of Titan is my favorite Vonnegut
book—it's got the perfect balance of his absurdism and genuine human
tenderness
- I liked Slaughterhouse-Five particularly
the 'So it goes' repetition. It imparts a sense of doom and frivolity in
the writing that adds to the deadpan satire of the book
- I think the absurdism and particular brand
of comedy of his books might not be best suited for the current era, which
makes them feel like a secret handshake with readers who get it (You see I
am just propagating the absurdism)
- I have read most of his stories and I find
some of them to be strange, and some just feel unfinished. Maybe that's
the point—life is unfinished, stories are unfinished, we're all just
making it up as we go
- Cat's Cradle is one of my most frequently
re-read books, probably because it perfectly captures how arbitrary and
meaningful everything is simultaneously
There are more
observations where these came from, but be content and have your fill out of
these for now. The implication of all of these facts being that when I left for
the US again, because another wampeter was waxing in my life, the only book I
carried with me was Cat's Cradle by Kurt Vonnegut.
My new favorite
author.
This is not the end.
As you might have guessed by now I am awful at getting to the point. The title
is foma, misleading, this isn't about my favorite author. Never has been.
You see between the
time it took me to choose a new favorite author, my life was still ticking by.
I got into the NBA for one—meaning I became obsessed with basketball in a way
that surprised me. Other things were also happening at breakneck speed. My karass
was expanding (or shrinking into a duprass), I was learning new habits and
forgetting old ones. I was becoming what I was pretending to be and being very
careful at what I was pretending to be. I got so much and most mud got so
little.
And the only real
lesson I learned is that I have got to be kind.
I used to say my
favorite verse was by Philip Larkin: 'This Be the Verse'. I will
replicate it here:
I used to think of
this poem a lot too. It was still my favorite but something didn't feel right
because I did not fully believe in it anymore. Then, without any warning one
day I found myself penning (yes actual ancient ritual of physically writing)
this down:
Thus Became The
Verse
It's not exactly
Keats, but I liked it. I might have written better flowing more loquacious
poems or verses but after a long time I had written a poem I was proud of. It
let me stop resenting Larkin's verse. I could still say it was my favorite and
have a rebuttal, a footnote of my own at the end of it.
Before leaving for the
US my brother randomly put an Indiana Pacers cap on my head. They were in the
NBA finals at the time, and him doing it just felt right. I am not particularly
a fan of the Hoosiers, but I do like to say 'What the Hali' every time Haliburton clutches up, which is a lot.
In the flight, while
re-reading Cat's Cradle I realized Kurt Vonnegut was also from Indiana. Finally, man (me) got to tell himself he understand.
And no, I am not going
to Indiana any time soon. But that's not the point.
You see the point
though, right?
See the cat? See the
cradle?